# Distribution of terms matters….

even if YOU don’t care about distribution, the logic police do!

If we want to be logical and hold others gently to the same standard, we have to follow some rules. Today we are talking about **Rule # 4** – the one smack-dab in the middle of all 7 rules for writing a syllogism in its correct form.

Here is a synopsis of the 3 previous rules

# 1 – Three and only 3 terms are allowed in a syllogism

# 2 – The middle term can’t be in the conclusion

# 3 – If a term is distributed (applies to all in the set) in the conclusion, then it must be distributed in the premises

Today we look at # 4 – The middle term must be distributed at least once. Since this term connects both the major and the minor terms, then it has to be as ‘ broad ‘ as possible to apply to the major and the minor terms. We follow the technical drill of labeling the terms in the syllogism. We visually check to see if the middle term is distributed at least once. If not……then we shout FUM!!! (aka – Fallacy of undistributed middle)

** Some chocolate is dark**

** All yummy foods are dark**

** Tf, some yummy things are chocolate**

Types of Propositions |
Subject Terms |
Predicate Terms |

A | D | U |

I | U | U |

E | D | D |

O | U | D |

When we label terms, we start with the conclusion ‘at the bottom’ and label up. (*the* *term IN FRONT OF the copula is the subject or minor term…..the term AFTER the copula is the predicate or major term*)

Tf, (*an I statement) *some yummy things (Su) are chocolate (Pu)

We spot ‘ yummy things’, then we notice that it is in the ‘ subject position of the proposition’ and write S. Looking at the chart, we see that for an I statement the term in the subject position is undistributed, hence we add a ‘ u’. The term ‘ chocolate’ is located in the predicate position of this I proposition; we write P and seeing that in an I statement, a predicate term is ALSO undistributed, we add a ‘ u’ next to the P.

Having identified the Major and Minor terms (also called the Predicate & Subject terms), the ‘ leftover term’ in the syllogism defaults to being the Middle Term (labeled M). We can now finish labeling Premises 1 & 2.

P1: (an I statement) Some chocolate (Pu) is dark (M u)

P2: (an A statement) All yummy foods (Sd) are dark(Mu)

So the whole syllogism looks like this:

** Some chocolate (Pu) is dark (Mu)**

** All yummy foods (Sd) are dark(Mu)**

** Tf, Some yummy things (Su) are chocolate (Pu**)

Is the middle term distributed at least once? NO!!!

Therefore, we can say to the person making the argument:

“ We can’t even DISCUSS whether your case is sound until your syllogism is in the correct form! And your middle term of ‘ Dark’ is not distributed even once! Your conclusion assumes too much, given the data in premises 1 and 2. You have committed…..**FUM** – the Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle Term.

** Off to Logic Prison with you! **

How is this useful? I find that knowing the 7 rules of validity is a quick way to assess a syllogism when I sense that something isn’t quite right. The logic error emerges quickly when I run the argument through this checklist.

Keep an ear open for a conclusion that seems far-reaching and let me know if you’re stumped. We’ll practice together.

## Leave a Reply