What’s good for the goose…..SHOULD BE…..good for the gander.

28 Oct

Good for the goose...

Let’s move outside of gender and look at the left/right political divide in the United States in 2015.

On a three-day class trip with 47 eighth-graders we spent some time in Atlanta at a museum.  I snapped this photo.

Grounding for civil disobedience  It says:  “I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.”

It should not surprise you that these noble words come from the heart and pen of the very courageous champion of rights for all races, Martin Luther King, Jr.

What struck me is that they could be the very same words from:

  • Kim Davis – the elected Democratic clerk from Kentucky who maintained that being forced to sign a marriage license for a same-sex couple violated her religious freedom.  Because she believed that this freedom to practice religion is guaranteed in the US Constitution, she chose to submit to a jail sentence rather than violate her conscience.
  • Randy Alcorn – the pastor who cannot make more than minimum wage due to a court decision against him in a suit brought by an abortion clinic.  Alcorn had protested the killing of unborn children numerous times, even being jailed. For details here is a link

So why do I bring this up?  Because what drives points of view, what lies behind arguments are foundational beliefs or principles.  And if we LIKE, that is ACCEPT, as rational MLK’s premise that being willing to suffer legal and punitive consequences for breaking the law of the land is actually a commendable HIGH regard for the law, then we ought to view the actions of Kim Davis and Randy Alcorn in the same light.

That does NOT mean that one has to agree with the viewpoint on same-sex marriage or abortion, but one must grant the reasonableness of the foundational basis and outworking of that principle.

If a person cannot be fair-minded and tolerant to grant that point, then what lies between them and the hypocrite?

As a parting thought, many have weighed in on these moral issues of our times and drawn the comparison to the valiant and fruitful work done quite contrary to the majority view in 19th century Britain and America that:

  • trafficking and possessing other human beings was normal and to be accepted

I hope that one day future generations will look back in disbelief at changes in the last decades of the 20th and first decades of the 21st centuries.  The two most drastic have been:

  • that we legally and routinely butchered unborn babies
  • that the ‘State’ supported and championed the redefinition of marriage, thereby undermining the unity of families

Both these laws have brought a degradation to the flourishing of society.  On the one hand, the next generation is reduced through murder; and on the other hand, the likelihood that all children receive the care, love and stability from living with their own biological parents is weakened.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: