Tag Archives: Pets

Reasoning from facts about the future

7 Sep

I came upon the following Scripture this morning as I was searching for an essay I had saved about the death of a beloved dog.  Our neighbors had to say goodbye to such a good friend and they are struggling with the hole he has left in their hearts.

As I was rereading the essay, the author referenced the passage below.  The prophesy about the lion’s diet floored me.  Read on:

Isaiah 11:  6-9

The wolf shall dwell with the lamb,

and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat,

and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together;

and a little child shall lead them.

The cow and the bear shall graze;

their young shall lie down together;

and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.

The nursing child shall play over the hole of the cobra,

and the weaned child shall put his hand on the adder’s den.

They shall not hurt or destroy

in all my holy mountain;

for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord

as the waters cover the sea.

Lion eating meat

I had to verify it, but according to what my Google search engine pulled up, lions in their present state eat meat and not straw.  And oxen are herbivores.

If that is the case, then God’s word to John about the future as recorded in Revelation 21:5 takes on new and specific significance concerning animals:

“Then He who sat on the throne said, “Behold, I make all things new.” And He said to me, “Write, for these words are true and faithful.”

Why should I be startled to learn that the God who created every thing that exists is also the same God who changes dispositions, tastes and digestive systems!

Here, then, is how I reasoned from that deduction.  My reasoning actually takes us back in time.  I am painting a hypothetical scenario, which I cannot prove conclusively, but I find satisfaction in stretching my mind thoughtfully:

If God changed man’s fundamental nature ( from being able to CHOOSE obedience to Him before the Fall into being able ONLY to sin as a consequence**), then it is feasible in the new heavens and new earth God will alter man’s fundamental nature anew

If God in the future will change a lion from a carnivore to an herbivore, then God in the past before the Fall may have created the lion to be different than his present predatory state

Why am I spending energy thinking through these rational possibilities?

Welcome, reality in a fallen world!

My body doesn’t work well when I eat the foods I crave.  Breads, oatmeal and starches appeal to me, but they clog up my system.  I do better eating meats.  Meat costs more than starches. And due to some financial decisions we altered our meals this summer to include non-meat dinners every other night.  Think beans and grains.  But they clog up my system.

Therefore, I have reluctantly accepted the evidence that eating beef, pork, chicken, fish and eggs is what God has chosen for me.  This diet goes with the ‘boundary lines (that) have fallen for me in pleasant places’ (as God defines my safe space! – Psalm 16:6).  This way of eating is what He calls GOOD, for me, in this current world.

My conclusion?

  • If the manner in which animals feed today in our corrupted world has been scarred, then maybe the reason for my slow and inefficient digestive system has also been scarred.

It makes logical sense, then, to accept these limits and gracefully live within them and look forward to a future world.

 

Arguing about cuddly cats and ‘going TOO far’

25 Jul

Random question:   Is it true that some cats make good pets’?  This was a claim or CONCLUSION from last time when we were examining an argument.  We had started labeling & analyzing the argument about ‘roads that lead to Rome’ and got side-tracked by CATS! (see to the right:  ‘Spotting errors in arguments, beginning steps’

Your HW was to practice LABELING the following syllogism:

All animals that make good pets cuddle well

Some cats cuddle well

Tf, some cats make good pets  

 

Do you remember the steps?

1.   Put each proposition in ‘logical form’

All animals that make good pets are animals that cuddle well (needed a copula and we CLARIFIED terms)

Some cats are animals that cuddle well

Tf, some cats are animals that make good pets

2.   Start labeling the terms ‘bottom- up’, beginning with the Conclusion

–      Subject term is:   cats

–      Predicate or MAJOR term is:  animals that make good pets

–      Middle term (what’s left over) is: animals that cuddle well

 3.   Evaluate the terms with some quick questions

–      Are there 3 and only 3 terms?  YES

–      Is the Middle term in just the P1 and P2? (a rule new to you today) YES 

–      Is the Major/ Predicate term in P1? (the major premise -can’t be in P2) YES

 4.  Here’s a new step – draw out the syllogism to see if we have enough info to come to the conclusion legitimately

 cats as good pets

Because we have a question of where to place that subset of ‘cats that make good pets‘ (in the blue circle or out of the blue circle), we CANNOT legitimately reach the conclusion that Some cats are animals that make good pets.   Visually we can SEE that the syllogism is NOT valid…so there is no point in continuing  to debate with a cat/cuddly pet disputer whether the argument is true, because he/she has NOT correctly formed a syllogism.

Had the syllogism BEEN valid, then we would have continued on to examine the truth of Premise 1 and Premise 2.  There is a logic law that states, “In a valid argument, if the 2 premises are true, the conclusion MUST be true.”  That IF is the crucial two-letter word. Today’s argument was NOT valid, for there was insufficient information in the 2 premises to determine if in fact SOME CATS ARE ANIMALS THAT MAKE GOOD PETS.

So, for next time, practice with the argument from our previous post, the one below.  See if you can draw it out like I did with the cat argument.

All roads lead to Rome

Old Cabin Cove is a road

Therefore, Old Cabin Cove leads to Rome